Our website would like to use cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.

Skip navigation

21st Jan 2022
HOME | Join Hardhatter | About Hardhatter | Hardhatter Special Offers | RSS Newsfeed

Small firms tax victory in the Lords

by The Editor at 11:17 26/07/07 (News)
Husbands and wives in business together breathed a sigh of relief this week as the House of Lords put an end to HMRC's attempts to levy the so-called 'married couples' business tax' on small businesses.
HMRC had fought a six year battle with Arcitc Systems, an IT consultancy owned by husband and wife Geoff and Diana Jones. The structure of Arctic was similar to tens of thousands of other businesses. The shares were divided between Geoff and Diana, both received dividends, Geoff was the major fee earner, while Diana supported the business through administrative work and general assistance.

Advertisement
HMRC had dusted off an old piece of legislation, known as Section 660, to argue that the dividends paid to Diana really belonged to her husband, Geoff - and should be taxed at his higher rate. Consequently, six years ago a tax demand for 42,000 arrived on their door mat.

The structure of their businesses was not unlike many others. In fact, accountants and even a Goernment web-site advised this practise. The implications for similar businesses were significant and a victory for HMRC would have brought a windfall of back-dated taxes for the Government.

Legal battle
Geoff and Diana, with the support of several small business organisations, including the Professional Contractors Group (PCG), fought their case through the courts.

Their first two hearing - at the Special Commissioners and an appeal to the High Court - ended in vicotry for HMRC. But the tide began to turn in the higher courts. The Court of Appeal found in favour of Arctic, but that was not the end of the matter as HMRC appealed the decision to the highest court in the lands, the House of Lords.

The final act in this long-running drama was played out this week when the law Lords found unanimously in favour of Arctic Systems.

End of the road?
Although HMRC refused to accept this as a test case - possibly as they would have had to fund the case, the implications are wide-reaching. It is highly improbable that the lower courts would ignore a Lords decision - and there is therefore little point in HMRC starting action against individuals under Section 660.

But the Government could still have the final say. Despite the Lords decision, it is the defeated party which holds thr trump card - the ability to change the law. And commentators are already discussing the possibility of a Budget announcement about 'closing a so-called loop hole'.

However, even if the law does change, it is still a victory for small businesses, as any new law would be for the future and small businesses will have the opportunity to change their operating procedures rather than being taxed for their previous - lawful - behaviour.

Further information
Hardhatter has written two articles summarising the events relating to Section 660:

You can also read more about the background and the issues at stake in Hardhatter's sister site, Shout99's Section 660 resource centre

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy.
-
Susie Hughes
The Editor Hardhatter 2007

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Powered by Novacaster